I2P_Developers/i2p.itoopie
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

give the reliability more positive influence so it doesn't go negative so easily

Browse Source 
update the peerProfile's CLI to make the resulting stats easier to read
This commit is contained in:
jrandom
2004-07-10 04:15:51 +00:00
committed by zzz
parent 809e12b034
commit 591dfc961e
2 changed files with 15 additions and 11 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
router/java/src/net/i2p/router/peermanager/PeerProfile.java
View File

@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ package net.i2p.router.peermanager;
import java.io.File;
import java.text.DecimalFormat;
import net.i2p.data.Hash;
import net.i2p.router.RouterContext;
import net.i2p.stat.RateStat;
@ -297,6 +299,8 @@ public class PeerProfile {
*/
public static void main(String args[]) {
RouterContext ctx = new RouterContext(new net.i2p.router.Router());
DecimalFormat fmt = new DecimalFormat("0,000.0");
fmt.setPositivePrefix("+");
ProfilePersistenceHelper helper = new ProfilePersistenceHelper(ctx);
try { Thread.sleep(5*1000); } catch (InterruptedException e) {}
StringBuffer buf = new StringBuffer(1024);
@ -308,9 +312,9 @@ public class PeerProfile {
}
//profile.coallesceStats();
buf.append("Peer " + profile.getPeer().toBase64()
+ ":\t Speed:\t" + profile.calculateSpeed()
+ " Reliability:\t" + profile.calculateReliability()
+ " Integration:\t" + profile.calculateIntegration()
+ ":\t Speed:\t" + fmt.format(profile.calculateSpeed())
+ " Reliability:\t" + fmt.format(profile.calculateReliability())
+ " Integration:\t" + fmt.format(profile.calculateIntegration())
+ " Active?\t" + profile.getIsActive()
+ " Failing?\t" + profile.calculateIsFailing()
+ '\n');

16
router/java/src/net/i2p/router/peermanager/ReliabilityCalculator.java
View File

@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ public class ReliabilityCalculator extends Calculator {
return profile.getReliabilityBonus();
long val = 0;
val += profile.getSendSuccessSize().getRate(60*1000).getCurrentEventCount() * 5;
val += profile.getSendSuccessSize().getRate(60*1000).getLastEventCount() * 2;
val += profile.getSendSuccessSize().getRate(60*60*1000).getLastEventCount();
val += profile.getSendSuccessSize().getRate(60*60*1000).getCurrentEventCount();
val += profile.getSendSuccessSize().getRate(60*1000).getCurrentEventCount() * 20;
val += profile.getSendSuccessSize().getRate(60*1000).getLastEventCount() * 10;
val += profile.getSendSuccessSize().getRate(60*60*1000).getLastEventCount() * 1;
val += profile.getSendSuccessSize().getRate(60*60*1000).getCurrentEventCount() * 5;
val += profile.getTunnelCreateResponseTime().getRate(10*60*1000).getLastEventCount() * 5;
val += profile.getTunnelCreateResponseTime().getRate(60*60*1000).getCurrentEventCount();
@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ public class ReliabilityCalculator extends Calculator {
//val -= profile.getSendFailureSize().getRate(60*60*1000).getCurrentEventCount()*2;
//val -= profile.getSendFailureSize().getRate(60*60*1000).getLastEventCount()*2;
val -= profile.getTunnelHistory().getRejectionRate().getRate(60*1000).getCurrentEventCount() * 50;
val -= profile.getTunnelHistory().getRejectionRate().getRate(60*1000).getLastEventCount() * 25;
val -= profile.getTunnelHistory().getRejectionRate().getRate(60*60*1000).getCurrentEventCount() * 5;
val -= profile.getTunnelHistory().getRejectionRate().getRate(60*60*1000).getLastEventCount() * 1;
val -= profile.getTunnelHistory().getRejectionRate().getRate(60*1000).getCurrentEventCount() * 10;
val -= profile.getTunnelHistory().getRejectionRate().getRate(60*1000).getLastEventCount() * 5;
val -= profile.getTunnelHistory().getRejectionRate().getRate(60*60*1000).getCurrentEventCount() * 1;
//val -= profile.getTunnelHistory().getRejectionRate().getRate(60*60*1000).getLastEventCount() * 1;
// penalize them heavily for dropping netDb requests
val -= profile.getDBHistory().getFailedLookupRate().getRate(60*1000).getCurrentEventCount() * 10;