include two specific issues with freenet
This commit is contained in:
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ pre { font-size: 10; font-family: sans-serif }
|
||||
<center>
|
||||
<b class="title">Introducing I2P</b><br />
|
||||
<span class="subtitle">a scalable framework for anonymous communication</span><br />
|
||||
<i style="font-size: 8">$Id: index.html,v 1.22 2005/10/03 00:31:27 jrandom Exp $</i>
|
||||
<i style="font-size: 8">$Id: techintro.html,v 1.1 2005/10/03 01:21:08 jrandom Exp $</i>
|
||||
<br />
|
||||
<br />
|
||||
|
||||
@ -754,8 +754,16 @@ has been said the anonymity and scalability claims seem highly dubious. In
|
||||
particular, the appropriateness for use in hostile regimes against state level
|
||||
adversaries has been tremendously overstated, and any analysis on the implications
|
||||
of resource scarcity upon the scalability of the network has seemingly been avoided.
|
||||
Further review of this "globally scalable darknet" will have to wait until the
|
||||
Freenet team makes more information available.
|
||||
Specifically, while publishing the "anonymous" topology in the darknet does not
|
||||
necessarily immediately expose all identities, it is equivilant to publishing an
|
||||
organizational chart for a covert group, which can in turn be used by an adversary
|
||||
along side existing knowledge of their target to narrow down or identify different
|
||||
participants. In addition, by using only peers that are locally connected, the
|
||||
network's mixnet layer is vulnerable to a class of
|
||||
<a href="http://www.im.pwr.wroc.pl/~klonowsk/LocalViewAttack.ps">local view attacks</a>.
|
||||
Further questions regarding suceptability to traffic analysis, trust, and other topics
|
||||
do exist, but a more in depth review of this "globally scalable darknet" will have
|
||||
to wait until the Freenet team makes more information available.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h1 id="app">Appendix A: Application layer</h1>
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user