Some of them think that its ok for an inner class of a subclass to access protected data of the
outer class's parent when the parent is in another package.
Others do not.
Kaffe doesn't care (but thats because Kaffe doesn't do much for verification ;)
The JLS is aparently confusing, but it doesnt matter whether its a code or javac bug, we've got to change the code.
The simplest change would be to just make the JobImpl._context public, but I loath public data, so we make it private and add an accessor
(and change dozens of files)
whee
if more tokens become available while the first pending request is still blocked on
read/write (aka after allocation and before next .waitForAllocation()), give the tokens
to the next request
* refactor the satisfy{In,Out}boundRequests methods into smaller logical units
this will give a much smoother traffic pattern, as instead of waiting 6 seconds to write a 32KB message under a 6KB rate, it'll write 6KB for each of the first 5 seconds, and 2KB the next
this also allows people to have small buckets (but again, bucket sizes smaller than the rate just don't make sense)
(this is what caused the runtime errors on sun jvms but not on kaffe)
((aka i slacked and didn't test sufficiently. off with my head))
this now builds and runs fine in sun 1.3-1.5 jvms, as well as kaffe
e.g.: -e "clientoptions tunnels.depthInbound=0" -e "httpclient 6666"
this updates so many files because they all need a reference to an I2PTunnel object on construction so they query tunnel.getClientOptions() instead of System.getProperties
the simple RouterThrottleImpl bases its decision entirely on how congested the jobQueue is - if there are jobs that have been waiting 5+ seconds, reject everything and stop reading from the network
(each i2npMessageReader randomly waits .5-1s when throttled before rechecking it)
minor adjustments in the stats published - removing a few useless ones and adding the router.throttleNetworkCause (which is the average ms lag in the jobQueue when an I2NP reader is throttled)
these had been broken out into seperate jobs before to reduce thread and lock contention, but that isn't as serious an issue anymore (in these cases) and the non-contention-related delays of these mini-jobs are trivial