82 lines
3.2 KiB
HTML
82 lines
3.2 KiB
HTML
|
{% extends "_layout.html" %}
|
||
|
|
{% block title %}I2P Status Notes for 2006-04-18{% endblock %}
|
||
|
|
{% block content %}<h3>I2P Status Notes for 2006-04-18</h3>
|
||
|
|
<pre>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
||
|
|
Hash: SHA1
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Hi y'all, tuesday rolls around again for our weekly status notes
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* Index
|
||
|
|
1) Net status and 0.6.1.16
|
||
|
|
2) Tunnel creation and congestion
|
||
|
|
3) Feedspace
|
||
|
|
4) ???
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* 1) Net status and 0.6.1.16
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
With 70% of the network upgraded to 0.6.1.16, we seem to be seeing
|
||
|
|
an improvement over earlier releases, and with the issues fixed in
|
||
|
|
that release out of the way, we've got a clearer view of our next
|
||
|
|
bottleneck. For those not yet on 0.6.1.16, please upgrade as soon
|
||
|
|
as possible, since earlier releases will reject tunnel creation
|
||
|
|
requests arbitrarily (even if the router has sufficient resources to
|
||
|
|
participate in more tunnels).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* 2) Tunnel creation and congestion
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Right now, it seems we are experiencing what is probably best
|
||
|
|
described as congestion collapse - tunnel creation requests are
|
||
|
|
being rejected because routers are low on bandwidth, so more tunnel
|
||
|
|
creation requests are sent out in hopes of finding other routers
|
||
|
|
with spare resources, only to increase the bandwidth used. This
|
||
|
|
issue has been around since we switched to the new tunnel creation
|
||
|
|
crypto in 0.6.1.10 and can substantially be tied to the fact that we
|
||
|
|
don't get per-hop join/reject feedback until (or more to the point,
|
||
|
|
*unless*) the request and reply has traversed the length of two
|
||
|
|
tunnels. If any of those peers fail to pass the message along, we
|
||
|
|
don't know which peer failed, which peers agreed, and which peers
|
||
|
|
explicitly rejected it.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
We already limit the number of concurrent tunnel creation requests
|
||
|
|
in flight (and tests are showing increasing the timeout doesn't
|
||
|
|
help), so Nagle's traditional solution isn't sufficient. I'm trying
|
||
|
|
out a few tweaks to our request processing code now, to cut down on
|
||
|
|
the frequency of silent request drops (as opposed to explicit
|
||
|
|
rejections), and on our request generation code to cut down on the
|
||
|
|
concurrency under load. I'm also trying out some other improvements
|
||
|
|
that are getting substantially increased tunnel build success rates,
|
||
|
|
though those aren't yet ready for safe usage.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
There's light down the tunnel, and I appreciate your patience
|
||
|
|
sticking with us as we move forward. I expect we'll have another
|
||
|
|
release later this week to push out some of the improvements, after
|
||
|
|
which point we'll reevaluate the state of the net to see whether the
|
||
|
|
congestion collapse is addressed.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* 3) Feedspace
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Frosk has been churning away on Feedspace, and has updated a few
|
||
|
|
pages up on the trac site, including a new overview doc, a set of
|
||
|
|
outstanding tasks, some db details, and more. Swing on by
|
||
|
|
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://feedspace.i2p/">http://feedspace.i2p/</a> to catch up on the latest changes, and perhaps
|
||
|
|
pelt Frosk with questions at your earliest convenience :)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* 4) ???
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Thats about all I'm ready to discuss at the moment, but please swing
|
||
|
|
on by #i2p for our meeting later this evening (8pm UTC) to chat some
|
||
|
|
more!
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=jr
|
||
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
||
|
|
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
iD8DBQFERSpfzgi8JTPcjUkRAmiFAJ97zHVXU/E2oQ5k3NMvjtundvWlzACfXAZX
|
||
|
|
nFrLMyhEQRCexJgH5VI2T38=
|
||
|
|
=awOK
|
||
|
|
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
</pre>
|
||
|
|
{% endblock %}
|