2013-01-03 02:59:06 +00:00
|
|
|
{% extends "global/layout.html" %}
|
2013-01-18 22:42:23 +00:00
|
|
|
{% block title %}{{ _('I2P Compared to Freenet') }}{% endblock %}
|
2013-01-03 02:59:06 +00:00
|
|
|
{% block content %}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>Freenet</h2>
|
|
|
|
<i><a href="http://freenetproject.org/">[Freenet]</a></i>
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18 22:42:23 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>{% trans -%}
|
|
|
|
Freenet is a fully distributed, peer to peer anonymous publishing network, offering
|
2013-01-03 02:59:06 +00:00
|
|
|
secure ways to store data, as well as some approaches attempting to address the loads
|
|
|
|
of a flash flood. While Freenet is designed as a distributed data store, people have
|
|
|
|
built applications on top of it to do more generic anonymous communication, such as
|
2013-01-18 22:42:23 +00:00
|
|
|
static websites and message boards.
|
|
|
|
{%- endtrans %}</p>
|
2013-01-03 02:59:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-06 01:55:33 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>{% trans tahoe='https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs' -%}
|
2013-01-18 22:42:23 +00:00
|
|
|
Compared to I2P, Freenet offers some substantial benefits - it is a distributed data
|
2013-01-03 02:59:06 +00:00
|
|
|
store, while I2P is not, allowing people to retrieve the content published by others
|
|
|
|
even when the publisher is no longer online. In addition, it should be able to
|
|
|
|
distribute popular data fairly efficiently. I2P itself does not and will not provide
|
|
|
|
this functionality. On the other hand, there is overlap for users who simply want to
|
|
|
|
communicate with each other anonymously through websites, message boards, file sharing
|
|
|
|
programs, etc. There have also been some attempts to develop a distributed data
|
|
|
|
store to run on top of I2P,
|
2013-02-06 01:55:33 +00:00
|
|
|
(most recently a port of <a href="{{ tahoe }}">Tahoe-LAFS</a>)
|
2013-01-18 22:42:23 +00:00
|
|
|
but nothing is yet ready for general use.
|
|
|
|
{%- endtrans %}</p>
|
2013-01-03 02:59:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18 22:42:23 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>{% trans -%}
|
|
|
|
However, even ignoring any implementations issues, there are some concerns
|
2013-01-03 02:59:06 +00:00
|
|
|
about Freenet's algorithms from both a scalability and anonymity perspective, owing
|
|
|
|
largely to Freenet's heuristic driven routing. The interactions of various techniques
|
|
|
|
certainly may successfully deter various attacks, and perhaps some aspects of the
|
|
|
|
routing algorithms will provide the hoped for scalability. Unfortunately, not much
|
|
|
|
analysis of the algorithms involved has resulted in positive results, but there is still
|
|
|
|
hope. At the very least, Freenet does provide substantial anonymity against an attacker
|
2013-01-18 22:42:23 +00:00
|
|
|
who does not have the resources necessary to analyze it further.
|
|
|
|
{%- endtrans %}</p>
|
2013-01-03 02:59:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{% endblock %}
|