Move deprecated RI options to a separate list

This commit is contained in:
zzz
2023-01-12 16:23:04 -05:00
parent 929d984536
commit 8b557d2557

View File

@ -61,10 +61,6 @@ to be present:
"Shared bandwidth" == (share %) * min(in bw, out bw) "Shared bandwidth" == (share %) * min(in bw, out bw)
<br> <br>
For compatibility with older routers, a router may publish multiple bandwidth letters, for example "PO". For compatibility with older routers, a router may publish multiple bandwidth letters, for example "PO".
</li>
<li><b>coreVersion</b>
({% trans %}The core library version, always the same as the router version{% endtrans %})
(Never used, removed in release 0.9.24)
</li> </li>
<li><b>netId</b> = 2 <li><b>netId</b> = 2
({% trans %}Basic network compatibility - A router will refuse to communicate with a peer having a different netId{% endtrans %}) ({% trans %}Basic network compatibility - A router will refuse to communicate with a peer having a different netId{% endtrans %})
@ -72,13 +68,21 @@ For compatibility with older routers, a router may publish multiple bandwidth le
<li><b>router.version</b> <li><b>router.version</b>
({% trans %}Used to determine compatibility with newer features and messages{% endtrans %}) ({% trans %}Used to determine compatibility with newer features and messages{% endtrans %})
</li> </li>
<li><b>stat_uptime</b> = 90m </ul>
({% trans %}Always sent as 90m, for compatibility with an older scheme where routers published their actual uptime,
and only sent tunnel requests to peers whose uptime was more than 60m{% endtrans %}) Deprecated options:
<ul>
<li><strike>coreVersion</strike>
(Never used, removed in release 0.9.24)
</li>
<li><strike>stat_uptime</strike> = 90m
(Unused since version 0.7.9, removed in release 0.9.24) (Unused since version 0.7.9, removed in release 0.9.24)
</li> </li>
</ul> </ul>
<p>{% trans -%} <p>{% trans -%}
These values are used by other routers for basic decisions. These values are used by other routers for basic decisions.
Should we connect to this router? Should we attempt to route a tunnel through this router? Should we connect to this router? Should we attempt to route a tunnel through this router?