From a9c20d3f630462cb10345eb3090bce4b2beaeda2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zzz Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 18:32:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] link typo --- i2p2www/spec/proposals/123-new-netdb-entries.rst | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/i2p2www/spec/proposals/123-new-netdb-entries.rst b/i2p2www/spec/proposals/123-new-netdb-entries.rst index 1d08803c..a554e3ab 100644 --- a/i2p2www/spec/proposals/123-new-netdb-entries.rst +++ b/i2p2www/spec/proposals/123-new-netdb-entries.rst @@ -2,10 +2,10 @@ New netDB Entries ================= .. meta:: - :author: zzz + :author: zzz, orignal, str4d :created: 2016-01-16 :thread: http://zzz.i2p/topics/2051 - :lastupdated: 2018-08-06 + :lastupdated: 2018-08-08 :status: Open :supercedes: 110, 120, 121, 122 @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ publishers for the top-level or intermediate-level Meta LSes on failure. Mix-and-match leasesets where leases from multiple routers are combined, signed, and published in a single leaseset is documented in proposal 140, "invisible multihoming". This proposal is untenable as written, because streaming connections would not be -"sticky" to a single router, see http://zzz.ip2/topics/2335 . +"sticky" to a single router, see http://zzz.i2p/topics/2335 . The back-end protocol, and interaction with router and client internals, would be quite complex for invisible multihoming. @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ To verify signature of each Revocation Record: Notes ````` -- We use signature length instead of sigtype so we can support unknown signature +- We use signature length instead of sig type so we can support unknown signature types. - There is no expiration of a service list, recipients may make their own