{% extends "_layout.html" %} {% block title %}I2P Status Notes for 2005-10-11{% endblock %} {% block content %}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi y'all, its tuesday again * Index 1) 0.6.1.2 2) I2PTunnelIRCClient 3) Syndie 4) I2Phex 5) Stego and darknets (re: flamewar) 5) ??? * 1) 0.6.1.2 Last week's 0.6.1.2 release has gone pretty well so far - 75% of the network has upgraded, HTTP POST is working fine, and the streaming lib is pushing data reasonably efficiently (the full response to an HTTP request is often received in a single end to end round trip). The network has also grown a bit - steady numbers look like 400-ish peers, though it bursted up a bit further to 6-700 with churn during the peak of the digg/gotroot [1] reference over the weekend. [1] http://gotroot.com/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=195 (yeah, really old article, I know, but someone found it again) Since 0.6.1.2 came out, there has been even more good stuff added in - the cause of the recent irc2p netsplits has been found (and fixed), as have some pretty hefty improvements upon SSU's packet transmission (saving upwards of 5% of the packets). I'm not sure exactly when 0.6.1.3 will come out, but maybe later this week. We'll see. * 2) I2PTunnelIRCClient The other day, after some discussion, dust whipped up a new extension to I2PTunnel - the "ircclient" proxy. It works by filtering the content sent and received between the client and server over I2P, stripping unsafe IRC messages and rewriting ones that should be adjusted. After some testing, its looking quite good, and dust has contributed it to I2PTunnel and its now offered to people through the web interface. Its been great that the irc2p folks have patched up their IRC servers to drop unsafe messages, but now we don't have to trust them to do so anymore - the local user has control over their own filtering. Using it is quite easy - instead of building a "Client proxy" for IRC as before, just build an "IRC proxy". If you want to convert your existing "Client proxy" to an "IRC proxy", you can (cringe) edit the i2ptunnel.config file, changing the "tunnel.1.type=client" to "tunnel.1.ircclient" (or whatever number is appropriate for your proxy). If things go well, this will be made the default I2PTunnel proxy type for IRC connections in the next release. Nice work dust, thanks! * 3) Syndie Ragnarok's scheduled syndication feature seems to be going well, and since 0.6.1.2 came out, there have been two new features coming forward - I've added in a new simplified CLI to post into Syndie [2], and dust (yay dust!) has whipped up some code to pull content out of an RSS/Atom feed, pull in any enclosures or images referenced in it, and convert the RSS content to SML (!!!) [3][4]. The implications of these two together should be clear. More news when there's more news. [2] http://syndiemedia.i2p/index.jsp? blog=ovpBy2mpO1CQ7deYhQ1cDGAwI6pQzLbWOm1Sdd0W06c=& entry=1128816000000&expand=true [3] http://syndiemedia.i2p/index.jsp? blog=ovpBy2mpO1CQ7deYhQ1cDGAwI6pQzLbWOm1Sdd0W06c=& entry=1128816000001&expand=true [4] http://dust.i2p/Sucker.java (we'll get it integrated into CVS soon enough) * 4) I2Phex Word on the street is that I2Phex is working pretty well, but that issues over time still persist. There has been some discussion on the forum [5] regarding how to proceed, and GregorK, the lead Phex dev, has even chimed in to voice support of integrating the I2Phex functionality back into Phex (or at least let the mainline Phex offer a simple plugin interface for the transport layer). This would be really quite kickass, as it'd mean much less code to maintain, plus we'd get the benefit of the Phex team's work on improving the codebase. However, for this to work, we need some hackers to come forward and take charge of the migration. The I2Phex code makes pretty clear where sirup changed things, so it shouldn't be too hard, but its probably not quite trivial either ;) I don't really have time to jump on this right now, but swing by the forum if you want to help. [5] http://forum.i2p.net/viewforum.php?f=25 * 5) Stego and darknets (re: flamewar) The mailing list [6] has been pretty active as of late with the discussion regarding steganography and darknets. The topic has moved largely over to the Freenet tech list [7] under the subject "I2P conspiracy theories flamewar", but its still ongoing. I'm not sure I have much to add that isn't part of the posts themselves, but some people have mentioned that the discussion has helped with their understanding of I2P and Freenet, so it might be worth browsing. Or maybe not ;) [6] http://dev.i2p.net/pipermail/i2p/2005-October/thread.html [7] nttp://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.technical * 6) ??? As you can see, lots of exciting stuff going on, and I'm sure I've missed some things. Swing on by #i2p in a few minutes for our weekly meeting and say hey! =jr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDTBeBWYfZ3rPnHH0RAncNAJ0YwUj/S1JvjWopGWZBR2+eT9hwHwCfRi2t pGTlS9rp+6WTthBLEZ07b2s= =rJ43 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----{% endblock %}