{% extends "_layout.html" %} {% block title %}I2P Development Meeting 207{% endblock %} {% block content %}

I2P dev meeting, February 10, 2009

{% filter escape %}
2009 Feb 10 20:58:32   dev meeting eh?
2009 Feb 10 20:59:27  -*- dream turns on devo
2009 Feb 10 21:00:25   dream: ah.. glad you're here too :)
2009 Feb 10 21:00:51   0) Hello
2009 Feb 10 21:00:55   you are?
2009 Feb 10 21:00:58   1) I2P 0.7
2009 Feb 10 21:01:02   2) Syndie
2009 Feb 10 21:01:06   3) Donations
2009 Feb 10 21:01:15   4) ????
2009 Feb 10 21:01:21   5) A short poem recital by zzz
2009 Feb 10 21:01:39   0) Hello
2009 Feb 10 21:01:53   hi
2009 Feb 10 21:02:00   welcome all to the #207th dev meeting
2009 Feb 10 21:02:05   'lo
2009 Feb 10 21:02:20   'lo!
2009 Feb 10 21:02:40   welcome!
2009 Feb 10 21:02:43   so, let's start by covering what's happened since April 10 2007, if anything 
2009 Feb 10 21:02:48   Just to put that in perspective it's been nearly 2 years since hte last one
2009 Feb 10 21:03:06   well... bush is out....obama in....
2009 Feb 10 21:03:36   lol USA
2009 Feb 10 21:03:51   1) I2P 0.7
2009 Feb 10 21:03:56   I guess the 0.7 release note is a good idea what happend to I2P
2009 Feb 10 21:04:20   Well it looks like the rollout of 0.7 has gone fairly smoothly
2009 Feb 10 21:04:22   with about 84% network coverage now
2009 Feb 10 21:04:29   not bad
2009 Feb 10 21:04:48   :-)
2009 Feb 10 21:04:48   How much ahs the network grown since 0.7?
2009 Feb 10 21:04:48   A big cheer to the dev team and release crew for getting it out of the door
2009 Feb 10 21:04:52   one bug i may point out that i and another user have noticed though is
2009 Feb 10 21:04:52   or even since Christmas?
2009 Feb 10 21:05:21  -*- welt waits for stats.i2p to load..
2009 Feb 10 21:05:28  -=- Sie sind nun als welterde bekannt
2009 Feb 10 21:05:31   hottuna_: a fairly slow but steady growth if the stats are anything to go by
2009 Feb 10 21:05:41   adding new private hosts in susidns requirs manual editing of the privathosts.txt file
2009 Feb 10 21:06:08   zzz: wasn't that the bug you fixed recently?
2009 Feb 10 21:06:18   or was that sth different?
2009 Feb 10 21:06:25   the stats shows a steady slow growing
2009 Feb 10 21:06:35   yeah, i broke it in 0.7, just fixed it yesterday, will be in -4
2009 Feb 10 21:06:40   welterde: yes, he seens to have fixed it
2009 Feb 10 21:07:05   something to look forward to in 7.0.1
2009 Feb 10 21:07:14   zzz: good.. that's done then
2009 Feb 10 21:07:16   eerm 0.7.1
2009 Feb 10 21:07:19   more users :-)
2009 Feb 10 21:07:22   sorry about that
2009 Feb 10 21:07:35   what are you guys going to do about network lag...its a growing problem it seems , on the weekends i2p seems overloaded
2009 Feb 10 21:07:56   maybe some more streaming lib tweaks?
2009 Feb 10 21:07:57   ethier i think more users is good
2009 Feb 10 21:08:00   zzz: well you've fixed and improved enough stuff to be allowed the odd breakage :)
2009 Feb 10 21:08:33   I've suggested motivating user to share by having some ratio indicator on the console
2009 Feb 10 21:08:57   that sounds good
2009 Feb 10 21:09:14   network load went big last month
2009 Feb 10 21:09:17   freak, i'm looking at tweaking the capacity calculation in the peer profiles just a little, to react better when things get busy.
2009 Feb 10 21:09:20   months, looks fairly well so far
2009 Feb 10 21:09:51   zzz: wicked :)
2009 Feb 10 21:09:55   this may be ambitious bout how about using a cron job in linux or whatever windows uses to volunteer bandwidth to i2p when their computer is not being used
2009 Feb 10 21:10:17   these things have to be adjusted with great care though, and it takes a full release cycle to test any change
2009 Feb 10 21:10:21   a scheduler would be and awesome solution aswell
2009 Feb 10 21:10:24   to dumb it down
2009 Feb 10 21:10:28   The publicity push for release 0.7 seems to have had a marginal effect on numbers, but not nearly the impact I would have hoped for
2009 Feb 10 21:10:41   detect when network / cpu is idle and use it/ dont use when it is
2009 Feb 10 21:10:43   zzz: that recent addition to I2CP doesn't allow that yet, right?
2009 Feb 10 21:10:52   some good coverage in german news sites though
2009 Feb 10 21:11:04   but slashdot/digg/reddit was rather pathetic
2009 Feb 10 21:11:09   allow what welterde ?
2009 Feb 10 21:11:14  <-- Roomster (romster@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 21:11:29   zzz: to change the ratio/up-bw/down-bw from outside the routerconsole
2009 Feb 10 21:11:29   badger: it needs some time for users to get known to it and keep steady with it :-)
2009 Feb 10 21:11:32   and a defult auto startup registry entry would be nice or a simple shell script for unix
2009 Feb 10 21:12:04   no welterde it has nothing to do with that
2009 Feb 10 21:12:08   dunno about the pr.. i suppose that our 'brand name' will grow every time we have a new release adn a pr wave to that
2009 Feb 10 21:12:13   zzz: thought so :/
2009 Feb 10 21:12:56   hopefully the gulli interview w/ me will be published soon, but I haven't heard from him in a week
2009 Feb 10 21:13:06   is i2p ready to ask for volunteer bandwidth from sponsors? (other than me with my tiny connection)
2009 Feb 10 21:13:39   hmm.. that might be worth a try
2009 Feb 10 21:13:50   I don't think anyone has ever said no to volunteered bandwidth.
2009 Feb 10 21:14:01  --> Roomster (romster@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:14:12   the tor network has a lot of sponsored nodes, but on the other hand a lot of nodes on the same subnet would be suspicious to users and offer someone more control over the network
2009 Feb 10 21:14:37   i think we "fixed" that already
2009 Feb 10 21:14:59   sponsoring would'nt be a bad idea
2009 Feb 10 21:14:59   jas a simple html tab on the mainpage?
2009 Feb 10 21:14:59   just*
2009 Feb 10 21:15:05   randomly placed nodes by individual volunteers seems to be safer
2009 Feb 10 21:15:05   but not as practical
2009 Feb 10 21:15:15   most people by nature will leech
2009 Feb 10 21:15:26  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 21:15:44   I don't think that's necessarily true unixfr3ak, but it's good to prepare for non-participants.
2009 Feb 10 21:16:21   for example
2009 Feb 10 21:16:40   someone who just starts the i2p router, and has no idea what it does and runs i2phex
2009 Feb 10 21:16:49   constantly downloading
2009 Feb 10 21:17:11   mabye the defualt bandwith should be changed
2009 Feb 10 21:17:22   has been changed in 0.7
2009 Feb 10 21:17:34   or users should be asked for connection speed during the install for more accurate bandwith shareing limits
2009 Feb 10 21:18:26   or mabye a virus that installs i2p as a backdoor :P
2009 Feb 10 21:18:34   heh
2009 Feb 10 21:18:40   would be a great idea.. the installer should support that, right?
2009 Feb 10 21:19:08   the first or the second? :>
2009 Feb 10 21:19:08   my joke or asking the connection bandwith?
2009 Feb 10 21:19:23   first) probably yes
2009 Feb 10 21:19:26   it should be a line or 2 in a config file somewhere
2009 Feb 10 21:19:39   the one without the :P
2009 Feb 10 21:20:59   download limits for users who don't share upstream bandwidth?
2009 Feb 10 21:21:15   sounds intresting
2009 Feb 10 21:21:20   but
2009 Feb 10 21:21:33   i dont think we should go to such desprate measures yet...
2009 Feb 10 21:21:38   by default it shares up to 100% of the bandwidth unixfr3ak. once it gets a few client tunnels, the majority is spent on intermediate ones.
2009 Feb 10 21:21:45   don't routers already punish other routers, who don't route tunnels?
2009 Feb 10 21:21:46  --> gloin (gloin@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:22:00   yes
2009 Feb 10 21:22:00   and I think i2p is already load balanced. I sure cannot download more than I upload on the bandwidth tab.
2009 Feb 10 21:22:25   i think so but, if many people leech at one time  it will still put a hevy load on the network
2009 Feb 10 21:22:32   perhaps this is just a case of being more informative to first time users
2009 Feb 10 21:22:35   especially if thier ips are dynamic
2009 Feb 10 21:22:46   http://stats.i2p/cgi-bin/tot.cgi?a=bandwidthReceiveBps.5m&s=365&u=y
2009 Feb 10 21:22:56   make it clear that giving back to the network improves your experience
2009 Feb 10 21:23:07   yes
2009 Feb 10 21:23:18   and to run it when they are not using thier pc
2009 Feb 10 21:23:36   insted of just letting thier connection that they are paying for be idle
2009 Feb 10 21:23:51   most people turn their computers off, it's really sad
2009 Feb 10 21:24:09   yes
2009 Feb 10 21:24:12   paying their ISP per month, when they could instead for the price of 4 light bulbs...
2009 Feb 10 21:24:15   i think most people understand this -  i even think most people who use i2p are geeks themself ;)
2009 Feb 10 21:24:32   anyway moving on - anything else to add for 1) I2P 0.7?
2009 Feb 10 21:24:55   for now yes
2009 Feb 10 21:25:16  -*- welterde waits for his signal..
2009 Feb 10 21:25:20   but that may change in the future
2009 Feb 10 21:25:25   badger: no
2009 Feb 10 21:25:25   2) Syndie
2009 Feb 10 21:25:37   ok then :)
2009 Feb 10 21:25:37  -*- badger passes the 70s boom mike over to welterde
2009 Feb 10 21:25:45   *mic
2009 Feb 10 21:26:15   as you may (or may not) i recently finished the effort to apply these patches from MOSFET
2009 Feb 10 21:26:20   +know
2009 Feb 10 21:26:25  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 21:26:35   leave e out on the forums i don't use them :P , brb cigarette
2009 Feb 10 21:26:51  --> gloin (gloin@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:27:14   which should fix some bugs and disable that (imho) b0rked default ui
2009 Feb 10 21:27:26   instead the swt one is used, which most users find easier
2009 Feb 10 21:27:42   w0rd
2009 Feb 10 21:28:11   hmm?
2009 Feb 10 21:28:30   it's nice to hear someone was working on getting failed synchronizations to retry.
2009 Feb 10 21:28:40   welterde: sorry, old dev meeting joke
2009 Feb 10 21:28:59   is there a new public syndie archive somwhere?
2009 Feb 10 21:29:06   anyway.. i hope i have time soon to replace that b0rked ;) index thingy
2009 Feb 10 21:29:09   badger: yup
2009 Feb 10 21:29:25   http://syndie.welterde.(i2p|de)/
2009 Feb 10 21:29:52   making it possible to run syndie using a remote database is important I'd say, to make it easier for people to run their own archives.
2009 Feb 10 21:29:54   but you can't post there (yet) as it is just a static archive
2009 Feb 10 21:30:47   have to that one to the default ones too
2009 Feb 10 21:30:56   will do that soonish
2009 Feb 10 21:31:16   so syndie work goes on
2009 Feb 10 21:31:32   yup
2009 Feb 10 21:31:54   currently trying to profile syndie..
2009 Feb 10 21:32:20  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 21:32:29   but wasn't able to spend much time in that area though..
2009 Feb 10 21:32:45  <-- hottuna_ (hottuna@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 21:32:59   so much work to do...
2009 Feb 10 21:33:14   yes :/
2009 Feb 10 21:33:17   running syndie in text mode is tricky, since the interface seems to be slipping behind its current behavior
2009 Feb 10 21:33:17   usually it works if you just leave it in --cli, but when it freezes there's no real indication.
2009 Feb 10 21:33:36  --> hottuna_ (hottuna@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:33:41   yeah.. the cli is b0rked too currently :/
2009 Feb 10 21:33:56  --> gloin (gloin@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:34:00   imho we should seperate syndie into multiple parts, eg. libsyndie, gui, cli, ...
2009 Feb 10 21:34:12   makes sense to me
2009 Feb 10 21:34:19   that should make writing custom extensions, etc. easier
2009 Feb 10 21:34:29   What sort of stuff would libsyndie cover?
2009 Feb 10 21:34:36   early v0.0.1 syndie's UI was just a top on the cli binary
2009 Feb 10 21:34:48   but it seems that idea got lost enroute
2009 Feb 10 21:34:55   it even has the text console today.
2009 Feb 10 21:35:23   dream: message decoding, archive syncing, etc. etc.
2009 Feb 10 21:35:25  <-- epoch (epoch@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Ping timeout)
2009 Feb 10 21:35:34   most of the logic
2009 Feb 10 21:36:06   so libsyndie is pretty much an interface over the database, and maybe the archive/ directory?
2009 Feb 10 21:36:09   aye, gui, cli and webtop should just be a light wrapper
2009 Feb 10 21:36:10   imho we should keep gui/cli seperate from the program logic
2009 Feb 10 21:36:42   dream: the archive isn't used to store anything.. it's just used for serving the archive
2009 Feb 10 21:37:02   I know that.
2009 Feb 10 21:37:12  --> epoch (epoch@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:37:14   but as cli/webtop use it we should put it into the libsyndie as well
2009 Feb 10 21:37:15  -=- Modus #i2p [+v epoch] durch chanserv
2009 Feb 10 21:37:15   So I guess only the web server would need to deal with that directory.
2009 Feb 10 21:37:35   filling it and synching from it, sort of like a postfix mail queue.
2009 Feb 10 21:38:00   but we should only generate/sync it, when we are actually using it.. not like now..
2009 Feb 10 21:38:08   where it is always generated/synced...
2009 Feb 10 21:38:24  <-- altGuest (chatzilla@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 21:39:18   I don't see a problem with only using the archive/ directory for the webserver. It's really just a convenience so you can use existing static file serving functionality.
2009 Feb 10 21:40:07   there should be a cli command like generate_archive or something like that imho
2009 Feb 10 21:40:13  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 21:40:57   and we should bring that import.cgi back, so we can run a mostly static archive, while still being able to post
2009 Feb 10 21:41:04   or... hmmm... 
2009 Feb 10 21:41:04   what would you do with that archive using the client interface?
2009 Feb 10 21:41:15   rsync with a remote site?
2009 Feb 10 21:41:26   that's how syndie.welterde.(i2p|de) works ;)
2009 Feb 10 21:41:31  --> gloin (gloin@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:41:43   trouble with a static archive is that keeping the filesystem up to date with the database is a task that is similar to designing a database.
2009 Feb 10 21:41:59   hmm.. not really
2009 Feb 10 21:42:05   as it's one-way only
2009 Feb 10 21:43:17   this may be a little off-topic but has anyone considered a datastore function?
2009 Feb 10 21:43:20   so using a hypothetical --cli someone creates a message. They then generate_archive after creating it? Sounds suspiciously similar to commiting a transaction after inserting.
2009 Feb 10 21:43:52   also in i2phex as i told Complication  previously the bitzi lookup in i2phex inst anonymous 
2009 Feb 10 21:43:55   magicbutton()
2009 Feb 10 21:44:04   dream: uhm.. no
2009 Feb 10 21:44:17   ...i2phex checks bitzi.com? that's nuts
2009 Feb 10 21:44:37   yes
2009 Feb 10 21:44:39   unixfr3ak: there was some work in direction of freenet afair
2009 Feb 10 21:44:43   welterde, so then their message never goes into the archive/ directory and can't get synchronized...
2009 Feb 10 21:45:20   dream: no.. just mean that a transaction is a bit different
2009 Feb 10 21:45:27   for example: you don't edit anything
2009 Feb 10 21:45:33   (except for the index maybe)
2009 Feb 10 21:46:02  --> altGuest (chatzilla@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:46:02   generate_archive just dumps the db and updates the indexes while doing that
2009 Feb 10 21:46:41   right click a file
2009 Feb 10 21:47:07  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 21:47:20   and view bitzi ticket takes you to the non-anon site
2009 Feb 10 21:47:20   lucky my browser is proxyd by i2p, and my alternate one tor
2009 Feb 10 21:47:31   so how do you get your new database content into the archive? What if syndie dies after inserting a message, but before you save it to the archive/ directory?
2009 Feb 10 21:47:39   0_0 looks like spongebob missed the meeting
2009 Feb 10 21:47:57   dream: nothing.. it's just not archive/
2009 Feb 10 21:48:16   but it will be on the next successful run of generate_archive
2009 Feb 10 21:48:33  --> gloin (gloin@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:49:01   what I'd do is let the client run the web server, and the web server checks archive/ and pulls out all the messages in the db not already there. Or just serve the db messages directly.
2009 Feb 10 21:49:23   generate_archive doesn't seem like the sort of thing you'd want the client to have to keep track of.
2009 Feb 10 21:49:50   problem is.. you can't run syndie on every machine
2009 Feb 10 21:50:18   for example this server (i2p2.de/welterde.de) has reached it's limited
2009 Feb 10 21:50:36   it will heavily swap when i run syndie on it..
2009 Feb 10 21:50:41   so i have to run it locally
2009 Feb 10 21:50:46   yeah
2009 Feb 10 21:51:06   no problem if i had reasonable upload... which i don't have
2009 Feb 10 21:51:19   which most adsl-users don't have..
2009 Feb 10 21:51:45   anyway - good work with the all the patches welterde - can we expect a release in the not-too-distant-future?
2009 Feb 10 21:51:47   so it's either a static archive or one that is slow as hell
2009 Feb 10 21:52:08   badger: i think i'll switch from a to b (alpha to beta) soonish
2009 Feb 10 21:52:16   great
2009 Feb 10 21:52:40   anything else to add about future dev?
2009 Feb 10 21:52:56   (syndie)
2009 Feb 10 21:53:10   n0pe
2009 Feb 10 21:53:19   ;)
2009 Feb 10 21:53:24   righty in that case
2009 Feb 10 21:53:30   3) Donations
2009 Feb 10 21:53:49  -*- badger swings the mic over to eche|on
2009 Feb 10 21:54:00   it's open again!
2009 Feb 10 21:54:18   I created a paypal account and linked it on i2p website
2009 Feb 10 21:54:39  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 21:54:42   :D
2009 Feb 10 21:54:47   coolio
2009 Feb 10 21:54:50   wicked
2009 Feb 10 21:54:52   but the buttons links to https:// sites of paypal, works not for eepsite yet
2009 Feb 10 21:55:01   yeah I guess that's an advantage welterde
2009 Feb 10 21:55:08   til yet no entry on that front
2009 Feb 10 21:55:20  <-- awxcnx091 (ce518902@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Quit: leaving)
2009 Feb 10 21:55:20   eche|on: maybe you should add some notes on how to tell you what you should do with it
2009 Feb 10 21:55:29   and undecided about a acc for 2ndlive
2009 Feb 10 21:55:31   can you add a link from the donate page to the halloffame page, and/or provide more info on what donations will be used for
2009 Feb 10 21:55:39   I still think whatever creates the archive should synchronize more than just dump.
2009 Feb 10 21:55:48   yup
2009 Feb 10 21:56:02   are you planning to support bounties too?
2009 Feb 10 21:56:10   welterde: acked
2009 Feb 10 21:56:13   you could just use apache
2009 Feb 10 21:56:17   dream: premature optimization ;)
2009 Feb 10 21:56:19   zzz: acked
2009 Feb 10 21:56:22  --> gloin (gloin@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 21:56:24   oops 3)
2009 Feb 10 21:56:24   I don't have any money sorry T_T
2009 Feb 10 21:56:28   we need a list of stuff to buy/not to buy with donations
2009 Feb 10 21:56:37   and shouldnt echelon and welterde subscriptions really be listed as expenses instead?
2009 Feb 10 21:56:40   what web server does i2p include?
2009 Feb 10 21:56:51   badger: yeah, donations are "for all funds" or dedicated for a bounty
2009 Feb 10 21:57:04   grand
2009 Feb 10 21:57:19   and in paypal there should be a textfield in which you can enter the goal of the money :-)
2009 Feb 10 21:57:33   you could also put a news link on the front page that donations are open
2009 Feb 10 21:57:36   If I donate 1000 EUR do I get a Hot Tuna i2P t-shirt?
2009 Feb 10 21:57:51   but I cannot donate to myself ;-)
2009 Feb 10 21:58:02   hottuna_: say yes! ;)
2009 Feb 10 21:58:16   no prob so far, I wait for the first one and announce it ;-)
2009 Feb 10 21:58:35   you had your chance to come to 25c3 and get a shirt
2009 Feb 10 21:58:47   there is still a 26c3 ;)
2009 Feb 10 21:58:59   acked, zzz - nice idea
2009 Feb 10 22:00:32   so no more from my site to topic donations
2009 Feb 10 22:00:51  -*- welterde waits for paste to load..
2009 Feb 10 22:00:59  --> awxcnx091 (ce518902@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 22:01:16   in that case:
2009 Feb 10 22:01:22   4) ????
2009 Feb 10 22:01:33   anyone else have anything to bring to the meeting?
2009 Feb 10 22:01:37   yup..
2009 Feb 10 22:01:46   but you have to wait until paste loads :/
2009 Feb 10 22:01:49  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 22:01:52   lets have a piece of cake for everyone!
2009 Feb 10 22:02:31   yay! :)
2009 Feb 10 22:02:32  -*- unixfr3ak takes it and runs
2009 Feb 10 22:02:38   nooooo
2009 Feb 10 22:03:03  -*- badger *bafs* unifr3ak on the head
2009 Feb 10 22:03:08   yessss
2009 Feb 10 22:03:12   ;-)
2009 Feb 10 22:03:20  --> gloin (gloin@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 22:03:46   i wonder if that part will go in the meting log
2009 Feb 10 22:03:50   :P
2009 Feb 10 22:03:57   I hereby announce *drum roll* thmoo: inbljam6y6mynwz2474hk655w2jtv7trofxbqzng4re26ga6rg4a.b32.i2p
2009 Feb 10 22:03:58   ;)
2009 Feb 10 22:04:04   unixfr3ak: of course it will!
2009 Feb 10 22:04:15   everyone get a telnet client and connect ;)
2009 Feb 10 22:04:37   not a MUD?!
2009 Feb 10 22:04:40   the base 32 key?
2009 Feb 10 22:04:49   badger: of course!
2009 Feb 10 22:05:06   unixfr3ak: you have to open a client tunnel and connect to that with a telnet/mud client
2009 Feb 10 22:05:08   (or use socks)
2009 Feb 10 22:05:38   i dont want to get my socks dirty ill make a tunnel :p
2009 Feb 10 22:05:43   hmm
2009 Feb 10 22:05:47   but for destination
2009 Feb 10 22:05:50   muddy socks
2009 Feb 10 22:05:59   does that include the .i2p ?
2009 Feb 10 22:06:05   unixfr3ak: yup
2009 Feb 10 22:06:11   worked for me at least ;)
2009 Feb 10 22:06:56   you can also look up the dest of a b32 if you want a local copy. zzz showed me how using i2ptunnel's secret cli interface.
2009 Feb 10 22:07:13   Delay Connect:   (for request/response connections)
2009 Feb 10 22:07:18   i take it yes for that
2009 Feb 10 22:07:21   that reminds me I should get these room descriptions off paper and into the darn thing
2009 Feb 10 22:07:24   welterde: maybe post a short howto somewhere ;-)
2009 Feb 10 22:07:35   dream: yay :)
2009 Feb 10 22:07:46   badger: heh.. will do
2009 Feb 10 22:07:58   Trying 127.0.0.1...
2009 Feb 10 22:07:58   Connected to localhost.
2009 Feb 10 22:07:58   Escape character is '^]'.
2009 Feb 10 22:08:02   impressive :P
2009 Feb 10 22:08:02   http://paste.i2p2.i2p/show/11/ <- the b64
2009 Feb 10 22:08:08   one comment about i2p in general:
2009 Feb 10 22:08:08   i think it is too much "from geeks for geeks" - you need to know what non-geek users need and want 
2009 Feb 10 22:08:16   wonder whats on the other side of the tunnel
2009 Feb 10 22:08:20   unixfr3ak, if you're extra paranoid yes, otherwise timing attacks may be possible to test if you're online or not. :>
2009 Feb 10 22:08:21   l00kns33: they want games! :D
2009 Feb 10 22:08:46   l00kns33, what could be less geeky than a text based online adventure game!
2009 Feb 10 22:08:49  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 22:09:01   unixfr3ak: works? you should see a menu of some kind
2009 Feb 10 22:09:02   I put on my robe and wizard hat!
2009 Feb 10 22:09:17  <-- epoch (epoch@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 22:09:19   of coarse
2009 Feb 10 22:09:28   that's one thing - and a good idea :)
2009 Feb 10 22:09:31   Welcome to thmoo-cmd 2.1...
2009 Feb 10 22:09:38   ha :)
2009 Feb 10 22:09:46  --> epoch (epoch@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 22:09:46  -=- Modus #i2p [+v epoch] durch chanserv
2009 Feb 10 22:09:47   you then need to type connect guest afair
2009 Feb 10 22:09:52   whats so impressive about telnet over i2p?
2009 Feb 10 22:10:30  --> gloin (gloin@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 22:10:30   we'll have a connect client soon so you won't need to set up a tunnel
2009 Feb 10 22:10:46   cool :)
2009 Feb 10 22:10:50   unixfr3ak: nothing?
2009 Feb 10 22:11:20  -*- welterde writes up a howto..
2009 Feb 10 22:11:26   has a weird chat feature :P
2009 Feb 10 22:11:45   well on that note - anything else anyone wants to add?
2009 Feb 10 22:11:46   unixfr3ak: you have to "say something"
2009 Feb 10 22:11:50   I wonder how that would work zzz? You mean like a VPN?
2009 Feb 10 22:12:01   dream: more like socks i think
2009 Feb 10 22:12:05   Or a specially designed telnet client? ._.
2009 Feb 10 22:12:19   Oh well I did hear about SOCKs.
2009 Feb 10 22:12:29   foo siad hi
2009 Feb 10 22:12:31   more like socks
2009 Feb 10 22:12:39   telnet localhost 1234
2009 Feb 10 22:13:00   connect inbljam6y6mynwz2474hk655w2jtv7trofxbqzng4re26ga6rg4a.b32.i2p
2009 Feb 10 22:13:00   unixfr3ak: and to answer you to "say something" ;)
2009 Feb 10 22:13:06   thats it
2009 Feb 10 22:13:15   socks is tricky, since it's like i2ptunnel except just about anyone can make new tunnels to different places.
2009 Feb 10 22:13:37   yes i know...no need to point out the painfully obvious
2009 Feb 10 22:13:50   dream: no.. i just uses the shared one
2009 Feb 10 22:14:06   at least.. that's how it should work ;)
2009 Feb 10 22:14:34   afk for a bit
2009 Feb 10 22:14:36   well I think we've reached a good point to...
2009 Feb 10 22:14:44  -*- badger winds up
2009 Feb 10 22:14:54  -*- badger *baf*s the meeting closed
2009 Feb 10 22:15:10   :-)
2009 Feb 10 22:15:13   good job everyone
2009 Feb 10 22:15:57  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
2009 Feb 10 22:16:12   you can't make a server tunnel with the SOCKS thing? hmm...
2009 Feb 10 22:16:34   I guess that would be a pretty nice thing for non HTTP protocols. :)
2009 Feb 10 22:16:49   Either that or implementing CONNECT in the eeproxy.
2009 Feb 10 22:16:52   now you guys are going to dissapear again lol
2009 Feb 10 22:17:30  --> gloin (gloin@irc2p) ist in den Channel #i2p gekommen
2009 Feb 10 22:18:38   poofda
2009 Feb 10 22:19:40   I'm still here
2009 Feb 10 22:19:49   our socks is client-only now
2009 Feb 10 22:20:51   I have CONNECT implemented, that's what I was talking about above
2009 Feb 10 22:23:20   Neat I can't think of any reason why not to do that, and it'd be lots more convenient since SOCKS is so goddamn popular many apps come with it.
2009 Feb 10 22:23:30  <-- gloin (gloin@irc2p) hat das IRC verlassen (Connection reset by peer)
{% endfilter %}
{# TODO: pygments #}
{% endblock %}