172 lines
9.8 KiB
HTML
172 lines
9.8 KiB
HTML
{% extends "_layout.html" %}
|
|
{% block title %}I2P Development Meeting 10{% endblock %}
|
|
{% block content %}
|
|
<h3>I2P (invisiblenet) Development Meeting 10</h3>
|
|
<div class="irclog">
|
|
Courtesy of <a href="http://www.archive.org/">the wayback machine</a>.
|
|
<p>
|
|
<p>--- Log opened Tue Sep 03 23:55:46 2002
|
|
<p>23:56 <@mids> test
|
|
<p>--- Day changed Wed Sep 04 2002
|
|
<p>00:34 < athena> hello :)
|
|
<p>00:34 < athena> no specific agenda today?
|
|
<p>00:36 -!- mode/#iip-dev [+o nop] by mids
|
|
<p>00:36 -!- mode/#iip-dev [+v logger] by mids
|
|
<p>00:36 <@mids> not yet atleast
|
|
<p>00:55 < athena> OQP... cute :)
|
|
<p>00:56 <@mids> what is OQP?
|
|
<p>00:56 < athena> occupe', i'm guessing
|
|
<p>00:56 <@mids> ic
|
|
<p>00:58 < gabierOQP> OQP=occupé in french
|
|
<p>00:58 < gabierOQP> busy
|
|
<p>00:58 -!- gabierOQP is now known as legabier
|
|
<p>00:59 <@mids> compris
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> Tue Sep 3 23:00:00 UTC 2002
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> Welcome to the 10th IIP meeting
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> Agenda:
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> 1) Welcome
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> 2) Website status update
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> 3) ...
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> a) Questions
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> .
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> lets go to point 1
|
|
<p>01:00 <@mids> welcome all
|
|
<p>01:00 < legabier> why freenet is so slow and iip so fast?
|
|
<p>01:01 <@mids> legabier: can we keep that till part a ?
|
|
<p>01:01 < legabier> ok
|
|
<p>01:01 <@mids> part 2
|
|
<p>01:01 <@mids> nop: status update?
|
|
<p>01:02 <@mids> hm
|
|
<p>01:02 <@mids> the website is in CVS
|
|
<p>01:02 <@mids> nop has reviewed the files
|
|
<p>01:03 <@mids> but there are some parts without good text
|
|
<p>01:03 <@mids> and the support area needs a better layout
|
|
<p>01:03 <@mids> appart from that it is done
|
|
<p>01:03 <@mids> I wont tell you when the site is up
|
|
<p>01:03 <@mids> but you are free to do private bettings on the online time :)
|
|
<p>01:04 <@mids> .
|
|
<p>01:04 <@mids> nop probably has something to add
|
|
<p>01:04 <@mids> lets wait 3 min or something
|
|
<p>01:06 < athena> lol
|
|
<p>01:06 <@mids> I guess nop is too busy with editing the website to answer
|
|
<p>01:06 <@mids> okay well...
|
|
<p>01:06 <@mids> before we go to the question round.. any other items we should discuss?
|
|
<p>01:08 <@mids> guess not :-)
|
|
<p>01:08 <@mids> I like it when everybody agrees :)
|
|
<p>01:08 <@mids> .
|
|
<p>01:08 <@mids> question from legabier: "why freenet is so slow and iip so fast?"
|
|
<p>01:08 <@mids> freenet is a different program, there is no technical relationship between IIP and Freenet
|
|
<p>01:08 <@mids> Freenet is completely decentralized.. IIP isn't (yet)
|
|
<p>01:08 <@nop> haha
|
|
<p>01:09 <@mids> Freenet is intended for file transfer, while IRC over IIP uses short lines
|
|
<p>01:09 <@nop> just because freenet is decentralized
|
|
<p>01:09 <@nop> is not the reason why IIP is fast
|
|
<p>01:09 <@mids> well, enlighten us, o master yoda :)
|
|
<p>01:10 <@nop> differences
|
|
<p>01:10 <@nop> freenet == high volume, low speed, static (archived) content
|
|
<p>01:10 <@nop> iip == low volume, high speed, dynamic content
|
|
<p>01:10 <@nop> different concepts all together, centralized or decentralized, IIP will remain fast
|
|
<p>01:11 * mids hopes that too
|
|
<p>01:11 * nop knows that
|
|
<p>01:11 <@mids> ok
|
|
<p>01:11 <@mids> does that answer your question legabier ?
|
|
<p>01:12 < legabier> yes merci :)
|
|
<p>01:13 * mids aims the spotlight in the audience.. searching for the next question and/or comment
|
|
<p>01:13 < athena> why are there so few public relays (besides the ones nop runs and mids', i see only 2 or 3 others usually)? do we have no volunteers or does the uptime checker reject a lot of them?
|
|
<p>01:13 < Sheige> I got 8 of them.... I guess
|
|
<p>01:14 < Sheige> (still a few)
|
|
<p>01:14 < athena> how many is that if you don't count mids' and nop's?
|
|
<p>01:14 <@mids> 5
|
|
<p>01:14 <@mids> source: http://invisiblenet.net/iip/crypto/node.ref
|
|
<p>01:15 < athena> hmmm, ok... guess i need to pull down a new one... still, 20 or so public nodes would be nice :)
|
|
<p>01:15 <@mids> I _think_ that the uptime checker is a bit too strict
|
|
<p>01:16 <@mids> codeshark had to pause it some time ago when the net was down
|
|
<p>01:16 <@mids> otherwise it would kick all relays out
|
|
<p>01:17 <@nop> the strict checking is a good thing
|
|
<p>01:17 <@nop> you'd have more problems if you had a lot of relays not working
|
|
<p>01:17 <@nop> it's better to have lower number with solid relay connection
|
|
<p>01:17 <@mids> nop: well.. but the reannounces dont seem to work
|
|
<p>01:17 <@nop> than a bunch of crappy ones
|
|
<p>01:17 <@nop> yes they do
|
|
<p>01:17 <@mids> hm
|
|
<p>01:17 <@nop> it just takes time
|
|
<p>01:17 <@nop> plus if you're a relay you won't see your route
|
|
<p>01:17 <@mids> then why do we only have 7 :)
|
|
<p>01:17 <@nop> because the stability of the relays
|
|
<p>01:18 <@nop> it may take a few more days for them to show up
|
|
<p>01:20 <@nop> talk to codeshark about this
|
|
<p>01:20 <@nop> he would have more detail
|
|
<p>01:20 <@nop> I will test it with him
|
|
<p>01:20 <@mids> ok
|
|
<p>01:21 <@mids> I think that I have somehow too many nodes connecting to my relay
|
|
<p>01:21 <@mids> but maybe there are a lot more users then we know about :)
|
|
<p>01:21 < athena> how many connections do you have?
|
|
<p>01:22 <@mids> I dont know if I should tell that
|
|
<p>01:22 * mids does some back channel talking
|
|
<p>01:22 < athena> could be that you're the best reachable relay
|
|
<p>01:22 <@mids> heh, I wouldnt say that with the recent lack of stability
|
|
<p>01:22 < athena> i often find that i can't connect through half of the hosts in node.ref
|
|
<p>01:23 < athena> and when you start with 7 that's not a whole lot of reliable relays
|
|
<p>01:23 <@nop> well, most usually are that are on
|
|
<p>01:23 < athena> just relating my experience...
|
|
<p>01:24 <@nop> maybe it's recent
|
|
<p>01:25 <@mids> it would be interesting to measure uptime...
|
|
<p>01:25 <@mids> but...
|
|
<p>01:25 < athena> you'd have to measure it from topologically diverse sites
|
|
<p>01:27 <@mids> nop: would you be against that?
|
|
<p>01:27 <@mids> if this whole thing wasn't about anonymity, I would love to see a lot of statistics :)
|
|
<p>01:27 <@nop> umm, if it exposes attacking info, yes
|
|
<p>01:28 <@nop> maybe we'll set up a non-anonymous weary system later and take stats
|
|
<p>01:28 < athena> i would say any publicly available stats SHOULD be published
|
|
<p>01:28 <@nop> especially as it gets bigger
|
|
<p>01:28 < athena> rely on the security of IIP, not on keeping info secret
|
|
<p>01:28 <@nop> well athena, if anyone was taking stats, they should be published
|
|
<p>01:28 <@nop> but no one is so far
|
|
<p>01:28 <@nop> anyone who is please publish your findings
|
|
<p>01:28 <@nop> ;)
|
|
<p>01:29 < athena> maybe i will :p
|
|
<p>01:29 <@mids> well.. I'll try to collect stats in a 'fair' way
|
|
<p>01:29 <@mids> without abusing my public node-powers
|
|
<p>01:29 <@mids> what I can collect that way, everybody can
|
|
<p>01:29 < athena> that's exactly what i meant, great
|
|
<p>01:30 < ArdVark> why not abuse your public node power and show us what that entails too mids?
|
|
<p>01:30 <@mids> now if I disappear from the IIP chat system... it is because someone doesnt like me collecting the stats ;)
|
|
<p>01:30 <@mids> ArdVark: maybe that is the next step...
|
|
<p>01:30 < athena> ArdVark: lol, excellent point! since anyway can become a public node...
|
|
<p>01:31 < athena> s/anyway/anyone/
|
|
<p>01:31 <@mids> athena: install a public relay and you do it :)
|
|
<p>01:31 < ArdVark> I wanna see the failures as well as the successes of this beast reported
|
|
<p>01:32 <@mids> would be cool to have 100 'agencies' all running a public relay to log connections, but in the meanwhile helping to boost the anonymity
|
|
<p>01:33 < ArdVark> on a different topic, not to end the current one, has there ever been any thought to adding wiki to invisiblnet? or too much trouble?
|
|
<p>01:33 <@mids> wiki as in wikiwiki?
|
|
<p>01:33 < ArdVark> yes
|
|
<p>01:33 <@mids> those $#@&%@ infobots are already some wiki
|
|
<p>01:33 < athena> mids: how do you know i don't already run a public relay ;)
|
|
<p>01:34 < ArdVark> I love those infobots mids ;)
|
|
<p>01:34 <@mids> ArdVark: I know you do
|
|
<p>01:34 <@mids> ArdVark: if you put a webserver 'behind' IIP.. then you could install a wiki on it
|
|
<p>01:35 < ArdVark> ok, that is reasonable I guess
|
|
<p>01:35 <@mids> but running a webserver over irc isnt too great
|
|
<p>01:35 < ArdVark> no I meant the website
|
|
<p>01:35 <@mids> oh
|
|
<p>01:35 <@mids> you mean on the normal website
|
|
<p>01:35 < ArdVark> yes
|
|
<p>01:36 <@mids> guess you could do that
|
|
<p>01:36 <@mids> otoh.. you could use a public wiki too....
|
|
<p>01:36 < ArdVark> ok
|
|
<p>01:37 <@mids> I think we shouldnt really install the wiki on sourceforge.... not now
|
|
<p>01:37 <@mids> since it is some work to install/tweak etc
|
|
<p>01:38 <@mids> but someone could run a wiki, and then IIP could point to it
|
|
<p>01:38 < ArdVark> fine
|
|
<p>01:39 <@mids> ArdVark: but maybe a public wiki for IIP (like freenet has now) is the way to go
|
|
<p>01:39 <@mids> .
|
|
<p>01:39 < ArdVark> yeah ok
|
|
<p>01:41 <@mids> I am going to sleep. feel free to keep chatting here :)
|
|
<p>01:41 < athena> night mids
|
|
<p>01:49 <@mids> for those who want to play with a wiki: http://mids.student.utwente.nl/~mids/phpwiki/
|
|
<p>01:49 <@mids> I dont care what you do with it :)
|
|
<p>02:00 -!- mode/#iip-dev [+o codeshark] by Trent
|
|
<p>--- Log closed Wed Sep 04 07:03:17 2002
|
|
</div>
|
|
{% endblock %}
|