echelon/i2p.i2p
1
0
Fork 0
forked from I2P_Developers/i2p.i2p
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

add a new throttle (and stats) based on send processing time

Browse Source 
high send processing time and low job lag means the latency is coming from outside the jobQueue - aka bandwidth throttling
This commit is contained in:
jrandom
2004-07-14 20:01:40 +00:00
committed by zzz
parent d25cec02c2
commit 744ce6966f
1 changed files with 24 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
router/java/src/net/i2p/router/RouterThrottleImpl.java
View File

@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ class RouterThrottleImpl implements RouterThrottle {
_context.statManager().createRateStat("router.throttleNetDbCause", "How lagged the jobQueue was when a networkDb request was throttled", "Throttle", new long[] { 60*1000, 10*60*1000, 60*60*1000, 24*60*60*1000 });
_context.statManager().createRateStat("router.throttleTunnelCause", "How lagged the jobQueue was when a tunnel request was throttled", "Throttle", new long[] { 60*1000, 10*60*1000, 60*60*1000, 24*60*60*1000 });
_context.statManager().createRateStat("tunnel.bytesAllocatedAtAccept", "How many bytes had been 'allocated' for participating tunnels when we accepted a request?", "Tunnels", new long[] { 10*60*1000, 60*60*1000, 24*60*60*1000 });
_context.statManager().createRateStat("router.throttleTunnelProcessingTime1m", "How long it takes to process a message (1 minute average) when we throttle a tunnel?", "Throttle", new long[] { 60*1000, 10*60*1000, 60*60*1000, 24*60*60*1000 });
_context.statManager().createRateStat("router.throttleTunnelProcessingTime10m", "How long it takes to process a message (10 minute average) when we throttle a tunnel?", "Throttle", new long[] { 60*1000, 10*60*1000, 60*60*1000, 24*60*60*1000 });
}
public boolean acceptNetworkMessage() {
@ -77,7 +79,28 @@ class RouterThrottleImpl implements RouterThrottle {
return false;
}
rs = _context.statManager().getRate("transport.sendProcessingTime");
r = null;
if (rs != null)
r = rs.getRate(10*60*1000);
double processTime = (r != null ? r.getAverageValue() : 0);
if (processTime > 1000) {
if (_log.shouldLog(Log.DEBUG))
_log.debug("Refusing tunnel request with the job lag of " + lag
+ "since the 10 minute message processing time is too slow (" + processTime + ")");
_context.statManager().addRateData("router.throttleTunnelProcessingTime10m", (long)processTime, (long)processTime);
return false;
}
if (rs != null)
r = rs.getRate(60*1000);
processTime = (r != null ? r.getAverageValue() : 0);
if (processTime > 2000) {
if (_log.shouldLog(Log.DEBUG))
_log.debug("Refusing tunnel request with the job lag of " + lag
+ "since the 1 minute message processing time is too slow (" + processTime + ")");
_context.statManager().addRateData("router.throttleTunnelProcessingTime1m", (long)processTime, (long)processTime);
return false;
}
// ok, we're not hosed, but can we handle the bandwidth requirements
// of another tunnel?