Files
i2p.plugins.firefox/README.md

190 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2022-08-07 03:11:33 +00:00
# i2p.plugins.firefox
A port of the batch scripts from i2p.firefox to Java.
## Getting started
2022-08-20 18:58:50 -04:00
### Using a Binary
```sh
mkdir ~/tmp-i2pfirefox && cd ~/tmp-i2pfirefox
2022-08-20 21:04:45 -04:00
wget https://github.com/eyedeekay/i2p.plugins.firefox/releases/download/0.0.10/i2pfirefox.zip
2022-08-20 18:58:50 -04:00
unzip i2pfirefox.zip
2022-08-20 20:23:27 -04:00
./i2pfirefox.cmd
2022-08-20 18:58:50 -04:00
#or if you want to use a Chromium
2022-08-20 20:23:27 -04:00
./i2pchromium.cmd
2022-08-20 18:58:50 -04:00
```
### Build Dependencies
You will need `ant`, `java` and for building the Chromium profile, a Go application
called `crx3` which is used to interact with the Chrome app store. I've been using Java 17
on Debian mostly, on Debian and Ubuntu, install the dependencies with:
```sh
sudo apt-get install openjdk-17* ant golang-go
go install github.com/mediabuyerbot/go-crx3/crx3@latest
```
For Fedora, use Yum, for Arch use pacman or something else but make sure to tell everyone
about it. Once you have that installed, when building, make sure to add `$GOPATH/bin/`
to your `$PATH`.
```sh
export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/go/bin
```
Will almost always work.
2022-08-07 13:59:32 -04:00
### Building
2022-08-07 03:11:33 +00:00
2022-08-07 13:59:32 -04:00
This is not actually a plugin yet, but it will be soon. The important bit is the jar.
To generate that, you can either generate the full plugin, which will not work but
produces the jar as a by-product, or you can:
2022-08-07 03:11:33 +00:00
2022-08-07 13:59:32 -04:00
```sh
2022-08-07 22:22:49 -04:00
2022-08-19 18:30:14 -04:00
ant jar
2022-08-07 03:11:33 +00:00
```
2022-08-07 13:59:32 -04:00
To build just the jar. You'll know it worked if you can:
2022-08-07 03:11:33 +00:00
2022-08-07 13:59:32 -04:00
```sh
2022-08-07 22:22:49 -04:00
2022-08-07 13:59:32 -04:00
java -cp ./src/build/i2pfirefox.jar net.i2p.i2pfirefox.I2PFirefox
```
2022-08-07 03:11:33 +00:00
2022-08-08 15:29:47 -04:00
and a new Firefox instance comes up with a fresh profile, ready-to-use for I2P browsing.
2022-08-07 22:21:13 -04:00
The cooler thing you can do with it is add it to an I2P distribution and somewhere in it,
add a UI element that triggers something along the lines of this:
```java
2022-08-07 22:22:49 -04:00
2022-08-20 20:32:55 -04:00
// Firefox Example
2022-08-07 22:21:13 -04:00
if (i2pIsRunning()) {
logger.warning("I2P is already running");
System.out.println("I2PFirefox");
I2PFirefox i2pFirefox = new I2PFirefox();
i2pFirefox.launch();
}
```
2022-08-20 20:32:55 -04:00
```java
// Chromium Example
if (i2pIsRunning()) {
logger.warning("I2P is already running");
System.out.println("I2PChromium");
I2PChromium i2pChromium = new I2PChromium();
i2pChromium.launch();
}
```
2022-08-21 23:49:08 -04:00
```java
// Auto-Select Example, chooses Firefox first, then Chromium
if (i2pIsRunning()) {
logger.warning("I2P is already running");
System.out.println("I2PBrowser");
I2PBrowser i2pBrowser = new I2PBrowser();
/*
* toggle chromium to the top of the order by doing:
I2PBrowser.chromiumFirst = true;
*
*/
i2pBrowser.launch(privateBrowsing);
}
```
2022-08-07 22:24:19 -04:00
to add a browser management tool to it.
### Browser Discovery Methods
This tool looks for browsers on the host system, creates a workspace to use for I2P
purposes, and launches the browser inside of that workspace. The details of the
workspace vary from browser to browser but roughly corresponds to a browser profile.
In order to be successful this tool uses 3 main types of browser discovery methods,
in this order:
1. "Local" discovery, where a browser is in a subdirectory of the directory where you
ran the launcher. This will only happen if the user unpacked a portable browser into
the same directory where they ran the launcher.
2. "Path-Based" discovery, where it scans common browser installation directories
until it finds one which it can use. On Unix, it simply scans the directories on the
`PATH` for a browser it knows about. On Windows, default paths to browser install
directories are hard-coded and included in the binary. This is what usually happens.
3. "System-Based" discovery, where it defers to the host system to make a choice
about the browser and counts on browser vendors to honor the system proxy environment
variables. This is a catch-all solution which works with most browsers, but does
not apply any customizations.
There is a little subtlety here though.
- The path to Edgium on Windows will **always** resolve during path-based discovery,
resulting in a positive test for Chromium when launching the browser in auto-select
mode. So Windows will never reach stage 3 unless expressly forced to. If Firefox or
a variant is installed, it will be chosen before Edgium unless directed otherwise.
- Linux is unaware of a Tor Browser path because Tor Browser is rarely, if ever,
installed on-path. What is on path is virtually always a wrapper for Tor Browser
which is installed either as the main user or it's own user. Linux will only use
Tor Browser if it's discovered in "Local" mode.
- The above is also true of OSX for now but doesn't have to remain so.
2022-08-30 15:15:21 -04:00
### Usability vs Strict.
This is basically a profile-management tool geared toward minimizing the
differences between browser users which are passively discernible while
they are browsing I2P. It assumes that they are part of a highly fragmented
browsing environment where they are already unique, and therefore consolidation
on configuration is a goal. However, this goal sometimes also conflicts with
usability. To allow users a safe set of choices, we offer "Coarse" configuration
in 2 modes. We recommend that you do not deviate from these configurations if
you have browser application fingerprinting as a concern.
#### Usability Mode
TODO: description
Pros: Allows a restricted subset of Javascript
Pros: Less likely to try and reach the clearnet
Cons: Looks very different from Tor Browser
Cons: Plugin updates can create temporary uniqueness
##### Usability Extension Set
- **I2P In Private Browsing**
- **uMatrix**
- **jsRestrictor**
- **LocalCDN**
- **Onion in Container Tabs**
- **HTTPS EveryWhere** in some configurations
##### Usability user.js characteristics
TODO: Summarize differences
#### Strict Mode
TODO: description
Pros: Does not allow Javascript by default
Pros: Looks a lot like Tor Browser especially if you're using Tor Browser
Cons: More work to use
Cons: Temporary uniqueness can be created by enabling Javascript for specific sites
Cons: More likely to try and reach the clearnet
##### Strict Extension Set
- **NoScript**
- **I2P In Private Browsing**
- **HTTPS EveryWhere** in some configurations
##### Strict user.js characteristics
TODO: Summarize differences