- Increasse routerinfo send frequency to every 90m (was 9h)
      - Don't send 3 floodfill infos at startup or with routerinfo
This commit is contained in:
zzz
2009-05-25 03:34:58 +00:00
parent 85963a5c72
commit 235058eab1

View File

@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ public class NTCPConnection implements FIFOBandwidthLimiter.CompleteListener {
private long _nextInfoTime;
private static final int META_FREQUENCY = 10*60*1000;
private static final int INFO_FREQUENCY = 6*60*60*1000;
/** how often we send our routerinfo unsolicited */
private static final int INFO_FREQUENCY = 90*60*1000;
/**
* Why this is 16K, and where it is documented, good question?
* We claim we can do 32K datagrams so this is a problem.
@ -200,7 +201,7 @@ public class NTCPConnection implements FIFOBandwidthLimiter.CompleteListener {
_transport.inboundEstablished(this);
_establishState = null;
_nextMetaTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + _context.random().nextInt(META_FREQUENCY);
_nextInfoTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + INFO_FREQUENCY + _context.random().nextInt(INFO_FREQUENCY);
_nextInfoTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + (INFO_FREQUENCY / 2) + _context.random().nextInt(INFO_FREQUENCY);
}
public long getClockSkew() { return _clockSkew; }
public long getUptime() {
@ -370,7 +371,8 @@ public class NTCPConnection implements FIFOBandwidthLimiter.CompleteListener {
_context.statManager().addRateData("ntcp.infoMessageEnqueued", 1, 0);
send(infoMsg);
enqueueFloodfillMessage(target);
// See comment below
//enqueueFloodfillMessage(target);
} else {
if (_isInbound) {
// ok, we shouldn't have enqueued it yet, as we havent received their info
@ -380,12 +382,18 @@ public class NTCPConnection implements FIFOBandwidthLimiter.CompleteListener {
}
}
private static final int PEERS_TO_FLOOD = 3;
//private static final int PEERS_TO_FLOOD = 3;
/**
* to prevent people from losing track of the floodfill peers completely, lets periodically
* send those we are connected to references to the floodfill peers that we know
*
* Do we really need this anymore??? Peers shouldn't lose track anymore, and if they do,
* FloodOnlyLookupJob should recover.
* The bandwidth isn't so much, but it is a lot of extra data at connection startup, which
* hurts latency of new connections.
*/
/**********
private void enqueueFloodfillMessage(RouterInfo target) {
FloodfillNetworkDatabaseFacade fac = (FloodfillNetworkDatabaseFacade)_context.netDb();
List peers = fac.getFloodfillPeers();
@ -414,6 +422,7 @@ public class NTCPConnection implements FIFOBandwidthLimiter.CompleteListener {
send(infoMsg);
}
}
***********/
/**
* @param clockSkew alice's clock minus bob's clock in seconds (may be negative, obviously, but |val| should
@ -439,7 +448,7 @@ public class NTCPConnection implements FIFOBandwidthLimiter.CompleteListener {
msgs = (_outbound.size() > 0);
}
_nextMetaTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + _context.random().nextInt(META_FREQUENCY);
_nextInfoTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + INFO_FREQUENCY + _context.random().nextInt(INFO_FREQUENCY);
_nextInfoTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + (INFO_FREQUENCY / 2) + _context.random().nextInt(INFO_FREQUENCY);
if (msgs)
_transport.getWriter().wantsWrite(this, "outbound established");
}
@ -465,11 +474,12 @@ public class NTCPConnection implements FIFOBandwidthLimiter.CompleteListener {
*
*/
synchronized void prepareNextWrite() {
if (FAST_LARGE)
//if (FAST_LARGE)
prepareNextWriteFast();
else
prepareNextWriteSmall();
//else
// prepareNextWriteSmall();
}
/********** nobody's tried this one in years
private void prepareNextWriteSmall() {
if (_log.shouldLog(Log.DEBUG))
_log.debug("prepare next write w/ isInbound? " + _isInbound + " established? " + _established);
@ -563,9 +573,10 @@ public class NTCPConnection implements FIFOBandwidthLimiter.CompleteListener {
// the floodfill netDb servers, but they may...)
if (_nextInfoTime <= System.currentTimeMillis()) {
enqueueInfoMessage();
_nextInfoTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + INFO_FREQUENCY + _context.random().nextInt(INFO_FREQUENCY);
_nextInfoTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + (INFO_FREQUENCY / 2) + _context.random().nextInt(INFO_FREQUENCY);
}
}
**********/
/**
* prepare the next i2np message for transmission. this should be run from
@ -647,7 +658,7 @@ public class NTCPConnection implements FIFOBandwidthLimiter.CompleteListener {
if (_nextInfoTime <= System.currentTimeMillis()) {
// perhaps this should check to see if we are bw throttled, etc?
enqueueInfoMessage();
_nextInfoTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + INFO_FREQUENCY + _context.random().nextInt(INFO_FREQUENCY);
_nextInfoTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + (INFO_FREQUENCY / 2) + _context.random().nextInt(INFO_FREQUENCY);
}
}